David Bordett, The Patient Gothic Chisel, The Front |
I was at Holly’s drinking an Aperol spritzer.
Tom, who is a writer, was sitting across from me. I don’t know Tom well but I
see him from time to time at the grocery store, at literary or art events and
we have some friends in common including Holly. Tom asked me why I had stopped
writing my blog, which I kept for two years and stopped writing in 2016. He
turned to his wife and said, "She was writing a blog about displacement.
It was called…” and he looked at me. "Village Disco,” I said.
That was more than a month ago and I am still
thinking about what Tom said: A blog about displacement. I had
believed I was writing a blog about art.
“The election.” I said, answering Tom’s question
about why I had stopped writing my blog in 2016. Everyone nodded slowly as if
saying, well, of course. But it wasn’t quite true that I stopped writing
about art because of the election; it definitely wasn’t the whole truth. The
last post I wrote was a response to the election, and after the election I did
feel a version of what the late night comedians would say in those days
“…because nothing matters anymore.” In fact, it was not that art mattered less
to me at that time, but that it mattered more. I wanted to be in the quiet of the studio
painting more than I wanted to be looking at and writing about art exhibitions.
At the time I was painting landscapes from photographs I had taken of the
Luxembourg gardens and Parc des Buttes Chaumont in Paris. I was also painting a pine tree that had been in the yard of the house where I lived near Marseille in
2004.
Five out of six of us around the table at Holly’s had moved to New Orleans from New York about a decade ago and within months of each other. The conversation had moved to New
York and what living back there, now, would be like: the cramped living spaces, the pleasure of reading on the subway,
and that here we have our own yards for our children to play in.
A blog about displacement.
Had this been a blog about displacement? I went
back and had a look at my blog entries, keeping an eye out for clues. I found
that I often asserted my expectations of a gallery, complaining when work was
hung too high or too cramped, but couldn’t those expectations have formed anywhere
including New Orleans? Maybe not. I wrote a whole piece about the weird habit
many New Orleans galleries had of playing background music as if a gallery were
a furniture store. In that post I do not reference other places but I think the
way I refer to New Orleans is accented, obviously not native. A glaring “I’m
not from here” post was my reaction to the Katrina reflection show titled Ten
Years Gone at NOMA and my irritation at a reviewer who seemed miffed that
not all of the work or artists screamed NOLA! at the viewer. I mention in
various posts and in various ways that my expectations were formed elsewhere,
my New York perspective transported in my carpetbag. Like this, in the second
post on the blog I wrote:
The expectations I arrived with were formed in New York and New York is easy to feel homesick for even if it is not your place of birth, even if you (sometimes) remember well all its frustrations on many fronts including art. The thing about making and looking at art in New York is that is so, serious. Also, it feels part of something global. When I moved here I couldn't even get a handle on the local use of the vocabulary I thought was universal in contemporary art.
The expectations I arrived with were formed in New York and New York is easy to feel homesick for even if it is not your place of birth, even if you (sometimes) remember well all its frustrations on many fronts including art. The thing about making and looking at art in New York is that is so, serious. Also, it feels part of something global. When I moved here I couldn't even get a handle on the local use of the vocabulary I thought was universal in contemporary art.
I end the post with a nostalgic Google Street
View grab of West 19th Street and wrote as if trying to convince myself, “I live here
now, in New Orleans; David Zwirner does not. I’m
okay with that. Mostly.”
Displacement. Displacement. I repeated the word
until I almost lost its meaning. And what does this have to do with art?
I told Holly and Tom and the others that last
summer I stayed alone in my brother’s Bronx apartment when he was out of town.
One night I had the windows open. I stood by the open window and I thought,
funny, it’s quieter here than in my house in New Orleans and the air smells
better. I thought vaguely of the word, belonging. The next day I went to the Met
and looked at French paintings of gardens and parks.
***
Lately, I have been considering writing about
art again. Tom's comment about displacement kept mixing with that consideration and so I went to see what was on view at The Front.
In the second gallery there was a show of works
by David Bordett titled The Patient Gothic Chisel. There were three sculptural
works and one photograph on view.
The wall labels for sculptural works were
detailed and abundant lists of materials. When an artist does this, the
materials can take on a kind of poetic weight. Included in the list of media on
the wall label next to Reliquary was “Christian Louboutin red flocking”
and “stalactites recovered from the exterior of the cloisters.” I asked the
artist (who was gallery-sitting that day) to clarify a couple things. “What is
Christian Louboutin flocking?” I asked (outing myself as more of sneaker and
boot type) and by “the cloisters” did he mean “The Cloisters?” as in the New
York museum. Once I had that information (Louboutin, the fashion designer of
the red-bottomed stilettos, and yes, The Cloisters) I went back and looked at
the piece for a long time. It was hard not to enjoy the light-absorbent red
fabric, the meticulous (Gothic?) details including the lancet window cubby that
held the relic, the so-labeled stalactite from the outside of the cloisters.
I remembered the first time I visited The
Cloisters on an afternoon many years ago. It was spring, and I had taken the
subway north to Washington Heights, to a part of the city that was new to me.
And I remember daffodils and the view of the Hudson River looking almost like a
painting from another another era. The air was new and clean-smelling. I was
with my sister and it is one of my fondest memories of being with her, though
the memory is thin in story and detail. My memory merged with the “relic” in
the gallery and I thought, memory itself is a relic that cannot be encased.
Next to Reliquary was a photograph. It
pictured the base of a stone wall, part of a recessed column, and an outlet
with an iPhone charger and phone plugged into it. Last summer when I was at the
Met with a dying phone battery. I stopped near a little display of books and
things to buy, not near any artworks, and I plugged in my phone. A minute or
two later I was politely told by a passing guard that I could not plug in my
phone there. Looking at the photograph I let out a little, spontaneous laugh.
This photograph was one of those artworks that was completed not on the wall
but in my mind as the viewer. The particular sum of my traveled path—the
cloisters all those years ago, my attachment to old European stone, my
experience last summer at the Met, and my vague and persistent longing that
envelopes art, Europe, and New York—made this work speak to me. It was not a
blockbuster work of art but it moved me.
The title of the photograph was The Patient Gothic
Chisel. The photograph’s title made a funny little comparison between the sturdy tool
that had presumably shaped the stones pictured and the fragile and antsy little iPhone sucking up electricity, loaded with concerns about being liked.
My experience of the remaining two pieces in the
show paled in comparison, though, as I have admitted, this comparison is based
largely on subjective and nostalgia-tinged experience. The two remaining works
stirred no memory, and so for me operated as a bit of pleasing eye candy. The
unicorn (titled Superleggera) was easy to like though I thought the
painted unicorn and color on the base were redundant and unnecessarily
distracting. The piece titled Many Paths seemed both democratic and
slightly cynical, saying something between Joseph Campbell’s The Hero with a
Thousand Faces and “Whatever.”
Before I left I talked for a while with the
artist. He said he used to live in New Orleans, comes back frequently, but now
lives in New York. I did not know the neighborhood he named when I asked where
in the city he lives. This happens more and more. I asked about Greenpoint like
it was an old friend. I have not been back to Greenpoint for a few years now,
maybe avoiding it when I return to New York because everyone I knew there is
gone, and on the streets one hears more English than Polish which makes me uncomfortably wistful. Two women visiting the gallery overheard us talking and said they were
from New York, neighborhood: Williamsburg. We all talked for a while about
neighborhoods here and there, rent prices here and there, and art here and
there.
Before I left I told David Burdett that I have a
friend, Holly, who used to work at the Cloisters. But she lives here now. I’d
like for her to see your show.
David Bordett, Reliquery, The Front |
David Bordett, Superleggera, The Front |
David Bordett, Many Paths, The Front |
No comments :
Post a Comment